A political statement circulating online has stirred debate after a commentator dismissed the electoral influence of businessman Obi Cubana and other prominent figures, describing recent developments as a “psychological war” aimed at shaping public perception.
In the widely shared remark, the speaker argued that celebrity endorsements and elite backing would have little effect at the ballot box, saying: “We must not allow them to win this psychological war. Obi Cubana and his likes cannot command more than 100 votes. They will spend the money and the people will speak with their votes.”
The comment is being interpreted as a criticism of perceived political influence by wealthy and popular personalities, suggesting that voter decisions will ultimately outweigh financial power and public endorsements.
Obi Cubana, a well-known entrepreneur and social figure, has not publicly responded to the statement as of the time of reporting.
Political analysts note that the role of celebrities and business leaders in election cycles continues to generate discussion, with supporters saying endorsements help mobilize awareness, while critics argue that grassroots voter sentiment remains the decisive factor.
Comments
Post a Comment