David Hundeyin Labels Deji Adeyanju and Sowore as ‘Controlled Opposition’ Funded by Foreign Foundations

Investigative journalist and political commentator David Hundeyin has caused a stir with his recent claims that popular activists Deji Adeyanju and Omoyele Sowore are part of a "controlled opposition" within Nigerian politics, masquerading as advocates for social change.

According to Hundeyin, both figures are allegedly funded by foreign foundations with interests in shaping Nigeria's political landscape.

In a provocative statement shared on social media, Hundeyin accused Adeyanju and Sowore of being "puppets" used by foreign entities to push an agenda that undermines Nigeria’s sovereignty. He alleged that their public advocacy for change, although seemingly in line with popular democratic ideals, is largely influenced by external forces rather than an authentic desire for social reform.

"Deji Adeyanju and Sowore may look like champions of social change, but they are nothing more than controlled opposition," Hundeyin wrote. "They are funded by foreign foundations with deep pockets and global interests. Their actions are not just for the benefit of the Nigerian people, but to serve the agendas of those who want to influence the direction of Nigeria’s politics."

Hundeyin’s comments have sparked a heated debate among Nigerians, with some supporting his viewpoint and others fiercely defending Adeyanju and Sowore as legitimate activists advocating for democracy, human rights, and the betterment of the country. Adeyanju and Sowore have both played significant roles in organizing protests, raising political awareness, and calling for government accountability.

Omoyele Sowore, founder of Sahara Reporters, and Deji Adeyanju, a vocal political activist and former presidential candidate, have long been critical of the Nigerian government, often leading protests and making bold calls for reform. They have both faced arrest and intimidation by security forces for their activism, but have consistently positioned themselves as defenders of democracy.

Critics of Hundeyin’s claims argue that his statements reflect an attempt to delegitimize those who challenge the status quo, labeling them as tools of external forces without solid evidence. Supporters of Adeyanju and Sowore maintain that their activism has led to important conversations about governance, corruption, and the need for systemic reforms in Nigeria.

The debate continues to unfold as Hundeyin's remarks add fuel to an ongoing conversation about the influence of foreign organizations in Nigerian politics, and the complex dynamics surrounding the country’s struggle for political and social change.